There are TWO Speeds of Light

 

Intrinsic to my postulations about light speed, tessellation, and self assembly is the idea that light has two speeds – a slow speed (C), and a very fast speed (nearly instantaneous).

There are two “speeds of light.” One is the tessellation speed of the medium’s crystallographically defined self assembly. The other is the light momentum’s speed associated with the “modulus of elasticity” for the medium. Of course the assembly of the tessellating structure is slow by comparison to the travel of light over a built path. So, the slow speed of light is the tessellation speed.

The built path is not maintained for the large transverse wave. Hence, there is no return of signal for the large transverse waves. By large, I mean the traditionally measured wavelengths such as 532 nanometers for green. However; the center of tessellation is capable of receiving the reflexive light from a connected photon. This means that for the center of tessellation, the speed of light is almost instantaneous.

The speed of tesselation is slow and is what governs the traditional constant for the speed of light. The modulus of elasticity for the built path is cause for the “fast” speed of light, which is nearly instantaneous on a built path.

The equalizer for the traditional speed of light being constant is the tessellation speed. So, light is bi-speed. Two speed light explains the strong and weak forces. The elasticity of the longer lasting built path of tessellation is stronger than the unmaintained elasticity of the medium in general. So, the strong force is elasticity built from entanglement force.

By the way, the weaker elasticity of the general medium is an explanation for gravity.  Gravity does not shape time space.  It shapes the medium, and that medium’s elasticity becomes the force.

Note: the author is a writer on technical subjects in some areas, of novels, and of other literature, but does not have any formal credentials related to the medical field, or in physics. Thus, this all constitutes an opinion of what might be possible, based on his own hobby-level knowledge quest

Hexagonal Tessellation: Concentric Rings

Quantum entanglement is driven by self assembly of a lyotropic medium by longitudinal percolation, and subsequent percolation and refraction in manner of a waveguide. It’s a partially tessellated hexagonal matrix, forming concentric “ring” structures, centered within the field.  It is this tendency for the partially tessellated hexagonal crystallographically-defined structure to build itself out in the form of rings – that drives the angular momentum of the energy in entangled connections.  

This behavior of the lyotropic medium is readily apparent by observing the output of a bessel beam laser apparatus, designed to produce concentric rings.  The rings have structural presence in the matrix of the self assembling hexagonal medium.  Therefore; the concentricity built into the self assembling medium drives angular momentum, and thus quantum entangled connections that mimic the action of a Wilburforce pendulum.  In practice, bessel beam vortex lasers CAN be used to entangle quantum entities such as photons, atoms, molecules, and quarks.

In the case of the bessel beam, the constructive and destructive interference of the larger (outside tessellation field) waves, causes reinforcement of percolation in the rings.

Since the only forces are percolations (almost perfectly longitudinal at the very center, and then carrying small refractive waves small distances from the center), we say that nature’s native force is longitudinal.  The ring structure inherent in a hexagonal partially tessellating matrix (field) drives a circularly drive waveguide effect for the angular momentum measured in quantum entangled connections. 

For the larger scale, the more visible energy is in the outside regions of the tessellated field and are refracted wave fields of a much larger diameter than what is generated by the highly rotational center-of-matrix fields.  The center-of-matrix fields will occupy a size exactly equal to the quantum component in question: atom, photon, molecule, quark, etc.

In all of this, one should note that ALL of the force is at its base longitudinal.  The refracted waves are built of percolating (longitudinal) forces.

Look very closely at a partially tessellated hexagonal structure: especially note a tetrahedron such as a Goldberg tetrahedron. The partially tessellated nature is a result of breaks by the triangular regions which cause the incomplete tessellation.  The hexagonal matrix is formed into a (near sphere) tetrahedron. You end up with sphere within sphere within sphere, to the limit of the plank equivalent for the lyotropic medium.  The partially tessellated structure is irreptile in nature.  That is, it is one within one within one within one, to the limit of the infinitesimal or some boundary with plank-like description.

Even just a flattened field of hexagonal tessellation is full of rings of macro and micro geometries.  The macro rings service the refraction of the larger (conventional light waves) – and the micro rings service the percolation of the longitudinal signals and tiny wave associated with quantum entanglement.

Note: the author is a writer on technical subjects in some areas, of novels, and of other literature, but does not have any formal credentials related to the medical field, or in physics. Thus, this all constitutes an opinion of what might be possible, based on his own hobby-level knowledge quests.

A Quantum Battery: Irreptile Power

Charge your car once when you buy it, and never again until that day, fifteen years later, when you take it to the trash heap? It’s all coming in the Quantum battery. I have been postulating about hexagonal self-similarity recently, tying it into quantum entanglement, energy transfer across the aether, and the building of atoms. The quantum battery is just an extension of those ideas.

If the atom is built with the irreptile form of nested hexagonal tetrahedrons, then perhaps it is possible to build an “artificial” version of an atom. Consider that the most energy a human can get to do his work is confined inside an atom. Consider that the Hiroshima event that released so much energy all at once was a crude release of this energy in a barely controlled way. What if that energy could be leaked into and out of a quantum battery, but much more slowly. The energy might last the lifetime of the car using such a quantum battery  to power it.

The atom is the main store of energy for humankind.  A little bit of energy can be stored into molecular arrangements of atoms, and then used later (combustion of gasoline is one example of this).  This uses inter-molecular forces, rearranging the outer electron shell (valence) configuration to get a tiny bit of energy from atoms, in an aggregate way.  But, the bulk of the energy is inside the atom.  The quantum battery taps the full energy of an “atom”, rather than the outside shell energy related to (for instance) gasoline combustion.

The atomic shells of the hypothetical irreptile-tetrahedron based atoms are very dense, energetically speaking. That’s why it takes so much energy to crack them open.  This pounding of atoms with a hammer is crude and dangerous, but is what war making nuclear devices do. Peaceful energy extraction must be more subtle.

It may be possible to develop a quantum interface to tap an atom’s energy slowly.  Alternatively, we might construct a sort of artificial atom, built with an Achilles heel back door to allow easier ingress and egress of stored energy.

The study of the hexagon leads to a quantum battery.  The irreptile capability of the hexagon, producing ever smaller nested images of itself, within a hypothetical tetrahedron atom, gives rise to the quantum battery.  All energy store that is atom based is also network based, as the energy transits the topology of the crystal and the nodes it contains. 

My theory is that sub-atomically, the same thing happens.  Theoretically, the nesting continues forever, meaning there is an endless supply of transit routes and nodes to contain endless energy.  One atom could power the universe.  Not.  Obviously, there is a limit to the nesting, and it is what I call the aether plank limit.

A quantum battery would not really hold a Hiroshima level of energy.  There is a misconception about atomic energy, and how much there is inside an atom.  A thousand nuclear fusion events on the tip of your finger is something you would not feel, and not because you were obliterated.  It’s because the energy in an atom is large compared to intermolecular forces, but still relatively small.  Hiroshima happened only because there was a chain reaction involving many trillion and trillions if atoms (would use a bigger word, but nobody would understand).  So the “chain reaction” is what we’d be looking to control in the quantum battery.

Note: the author is a writer on technical subjects in some areas, of novels, and of other literature, but does not have any formal credentials related to the medical field, or in physics. Thus, this all constitutes an opinion of what might be possible, based on his own hobby-level knowledge quests