Entanglement is, IMO, a very classical Newtonian phenomenon. The nature of the aether is to allow energy-to-energy interactions, but little in the way of energy-to-mass interactions, thus hiding the conduits for entanglement. The tiny level of energy-to-mass interaction in the aether is the reason that, like the entanglement connections, we do not see the aether. Our detection equipment relies on the interaction of mass and energy to detect anything.
But one may ask, how does energy ever interact with mass, if the aether is not very helpful in this regard? The answer, I think, is that energy which is outside of the influence of matter is reliant on the aether for transfer, but energy itself interacts very well with matter once it is in coincidence with it. Thus, it is only the transport of energy from one mass to another that requires the aether intermediary. Once energy has coupled with mass, it exhibits all the characteristics we readily see with our mass-energy detection equipment.
Entangled connections probably start on circuits that are coincident and colinear, relative to each of the bits of energy that are being entangled with one another. Once the entanglement has taken place, the entangled connection may diverge from the original path, following the movement of any of the particles involved in the connection. This is because, IMO, the entangled connections are magnetic, and exhibit a magnetic affinity that keeps the endpoints of the entanglement strands connected to each other. This is probably because the aether, while behaving like a plasma, underlies magnetism itself, by virtue of its structure. So an entangled connection would consist of end-to-end inverted vortex dipoles (a magnet).
Note: the author is a writer on technical subjects in some areas, of novels, and of other literature, but does not have any formal credentials related to the medical field, or in physics. Thus, this all constitutes an opinion of what might be possible, based on his own hobby-level knowledge quests
Quantum Extinction 