Honeycombs: Connecting Beams of Light together

This blog’s author does not do the rigors of the proofs.  That task is left to others.  A result of being free of the tethers of proofs is that I can push the envelope of what my imagination can conceive may be true.  So, in the real world, we can connect two optical fiber cables to permit transmission of light thru both sections of cable.   Is it that light in the sky is really no different?  Is it that two “sections” of light aether-cable can be connected together?

Anyone who’s been reading my blog knows that I’ve formulated an idea about conduits of light in the aether, and how they represent entanglement (in addition to the normal action of light).  I’ve borrowed a term to describe it: “Light is a coaxial circuit in the aether” – and this is a term that comes from the YT channel of Theoria.  Note the author of that channel is not related to this author or site.  Anyway, his term makes sense, in an abstract way.

According to me, entanglement is nothing more than alternate-mode light transit between two end-points (I variously call them quantum endpoints or quantum aether endpoints).  The alternate mode is likely combinational (longitudinal + potentially torsional attributes living at the scale of the aether’s granularity), and is substantially hidden from the type of detection schemes that we have so far devised for such things.    I have used the mechanical analogy of the Wilberforce pendulum and Newton’s cradle to describe the operation of entanglement such as I envision.

Why mechanical?  Because I believe that the underlying layout of the universe boils down to the distribution of mechanical actions on the fabric of the aether.  There is only one thing of which the universe is built: the aether.  All the formulations of the aether (atoms and molecules, for instance) are specific types and shapes created by the paths of the vibrations.

We are connecting beams of light together.

According to me, normal entanglement is a ping-pong between two points in the aether, where the endpoints are defined by aether discontinuities.   There is a lesser form of entanglement, which can be artificially created with a silicon nitride membrane.  In this lesser form of entanglement, two beams of light are connected with one another via the membrane.  The membrane introduces a spatially dependent feature to the entangled photons, such that the path between entangled partners must traverse the center point of the membrane in order for the light beams to remain connected (entangled).  In all other ways, the entanglement is the same as “normal” entanglement.

So, what are we doing when we use the membrane?  We are “artificially” connecting two coaxial cables of light in the aether.  We are connecting beams of light together, using their alternate modes of transfer.  There is no spooky action at a distance.  The action exists, but it is not spooky. It is clearly classical and Newtonian and force transfer based.  It has a path, which may be artificially created (in the case of membranes).  An artificially created path might be spatially dependent, but normal entanglement is not.

I wondered about the cause of the light beam connections via the membrane.  True, the mechanical action of a membrane in general matches up with the concept of a vibrating aether, but more deeply I wondered about its features, and how I could make better sense of them.

A silicon nitride membrane may take one of several forms, including the honeycomb.  The honeycomb lattice is a hexigonal lattice, and has been used for decades as a light channeling device in semicon/optics science.  A honeycomb lattice may allow for the precise alignment of two beams of light, so as to afford a connection. This idea in in concert with my thoughts of tubular aether discontinuity channels, which would indeed require precise alignment. Light channeling is simply connecting the coax, folks, and silicon nitride may act as the connector.

Note: the author is a writer on technical subjects in some areas, of novels, and of other literature, but does not have any formal credentials related to the medical field, or in physics.  Thus, this all constitutes an opinion of what might be possible, based on his own hobby-level knowledge quests.

Is Entanglement TRULY a Simple Mechanical Action?

I recently posted a comment on a YT site I sometimes visit.  Here’s the gist of it:

---

¹ “This is the second best nugget of information I’ve run across, as I try to build a case for my own pet theory of entanglement. Here is a quote from my own page:”

“Now we can again consider my idea about entanglement being like Newton’s Cradle, where a discrete amount of momentum is being transferred back and forth between what – heretofore – I may have described as “quantum” endpoints. All that was needed was a “sameness” between the photons involved. That “sameness” comes from the idea in the quote (shown in green, above). If we accept the ping-pong action of entanglement through the aether, then the quoted line suggests that any photon can be entangled with any other photon, no matter how much discrepency exists between them in terms of wavelength. This enables the ping-pong.”

“The quoted green line came from your video. My paraphrase of it is:”

One wavelength of light contains the same energy, no matter what that wavelength might be.

“It was one of the needed ingredients. News that a simple membrane can entangle the entire beam content of two beams of energy with each other (even if one beam is a large wavelength (microwave) and one a small wavelength (laser), so long as the membrane is able to fit both wavelengths geometrically – can be matched up with your discovery of the “misinterpretation” – and yield a simple mechanical action for “action at a distance”.”

BTW: Physicists can do MUA too, so I think the “misinterpretation” was either willful ignorance or intentional, but that’s a topic for another day. Sorry for long post. But, THANKS!”

---

[End of Quote]

The idea in the green quote is extremely important to understand a simple mechanical action for what has forever been referred to as quantum entanglement, but which I refer to as aether entanglement.  If each wavelength of radiation carries the same momentum, then when a photon from one beam impinges upon the membrane, the membrane will elastically deflect an amount which (depending on the synchronization of each beam) – be exactly reflected back into the other beam’s trajectory.  This action would reciprocate, leading to a long running ping-pong sort of action.

Stay tuned …

¹ Note the YT channel I paraphrase is the “Fractal Woman” channel, which I must mention is not affiliated with this author.  I say that not because the site is not good, but because I don’t want to imply any connection from sites I visit and this site, simply because I may carry some unconventional and perhaps contentious views on these pages.

Note: the author is a writer on technical subjects in some areas, of novels, and of other literature, but does not have any formal credentials related to the medical field, or in physics.  Thus, this all constitutes an opinion of what might be possible, based on his own knowledge quests.